Author Topic: Images On Google  (Read 8324 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline __G__

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
    • View Profile
Images On Google
« on: February 14, 2007, 03:42:03 AM »
Whats the fastest way guys to show my images on google images search

Offline CeJay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 425
    • View Profile
Re: Images On Google
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2007, 05:45:49 AM »
make sure you have been indexed by google, dont know of any other way as they wont show your images if you have not been indexed

Offline __G__

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
    • View Profile
Re: Images On Google
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2007, 09:19:13 AM »
I did got indexed by Google but i don't see any images from my site on Google :( and only my front page got index :( even after the Google site map is there any special .htaccess setup

Offline kleiner_Hobbit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
    • Berlin in Bildern
Re: Images On Google
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2007, 11:54:21 AM »
I think it is important to choose correct file-names to be found by google-image-search.
The file-name shouldn´t be out of the cam or just a date, is has to be a real name which shows the content of the picture.

Offline CeJay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 425
    • View Profile
Re: Images On Google
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2007, 09:28:03 PM »
only my front page got index

Use a robots.txt file to google and any other search engine on what you want indexed.
You can even tell them what you do not want indexed if you like.
Also tell google to revisit the site like every 30 days or something like that.

Usually when google does an index, it will take up to 90 days before you can see any changes on google, sometimes even longer. That is just how they run, but they don't tell anyone on how they index or update their listings, images, etc...

Offline trez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
    • View Profile
    • blog / photography
Re: Images On Google
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2007, 10:46:21 AM »