[MOD Req] Who's online more detailed-

[Stoleti]

sure Stoletti, because you have to be registered to see the pics.
Use username "test" and pw "test" to view it

Alright  let's try

[Stoleti]

actually i've the same in some test-gallery , and the problem still in make show 3 or 4 users by row , and not 1 by row 

[trez]

just one is better, imagine if you have 50 users online it will be hard to have an overview... one per row is ok, but i need the extrafields, proportional image etc.... oracle lease help

[Stoleti]

just one is better, imagine if you have 50 users online it will be hard to have an overview... one per row is ok, but i need the extrafields, proportional image etc.... oracle lease help

having 50 rows , its better ?

In my opinion if we can use half of rows , ill be more easy, and saving more space on site design , but thats my opinion 

[trez]

sure, iam just trieng to figure out how to add more fields to show, for example user_gender

so, Oracle made this changes:

first register the field:

Code: [Select]

$userpic_img = ($config['userpic'] && @file_exists(ROOT_PATH."data/userpic/".$row['userpic']) && $user_info['user_level'] >= USER) ? "<img src=\"".ROOT_PATH."data/userpic/".$row['userpic']."\" width=\"100".$userpic_width."\" height=\"100".$userpic_height."\">" : "";
then activate(?) it:

Code: [Select]

$whos_online_userpic = str_replace("{userpic_img}", "", $userpic_img);
and finally put it in the right place:

Code: [Select]

$user_online_list .= "<a href=\"".$site_sess->url($user_profile_link)."\"><center>".$whos_online_userpic."<br />".$username."</a>".$invisibleuser."</center>".REPLACE_EMPTY. REPLACE_EMPTY;
So, now i have to find out how to "register" the same way user_gender, user_location and user_birthday ...

[Stoleti]

well but we can make that work using another style 

like this screenshot below



 

[TheOracle]

just one is better, imagine if you have 50 users online it will be hard to have an overview... one per row is ok, but i need the extrafields, proportional image etc....

That is exacly my point of vue. 50 users would be still considered a small mount of users in the USERS_TABLE. Althought, consider if users has hundreds of them to handle, this is where it will begin to be a little bit cranky unless the paging class would be involved (that would sure help but only temporary since users would still amend for more fields to be implemented).

[trez]

Oracle, can you please reply to my other (more relevant) posts before, iam really getting confused, i tried so many ways to get it done but without success.... You made the userpic appear, the other things will be more eeasy for you to integrate

[trez]

well but we can make that work using another style 

like this screenshot below



 

The style is easy, if Oracle helps me with the fields i can make that style you posted - at least one thing i can help with

[Stoleti]

well but we can make that work using another style 

like this screenshot below



 

The style is easy, if Oracle helps me with the fields i can make that style you posted - at least one thing i can help with

Sounds Good  , this its in my opinion a better style for this type of userslist (who's online) still 1 by row , but the we use better the space on site design, being your site design , very similar with mine too 

But i agree with TheOracle at long time , if site have hundred users, i think paging ill be necessary 

[trez]

no, paging would be NOT necessary, better would be a filter like

- show just females\males
- show members from 16-25 years (dropdown)
- show members from "city"(dropdown)

but thats in the future, and it isnt so important. That would be a whole new MOD.. whatever, we wait for Oracle

PS: Give me a link to your site

[Stoleti]

no, paging would be NOT necessary, better would be a filter like

- show just females\males
- show members from 16-25 years (dropdown)
- show members from "city"(dropdown)

but thats in the future, and it isnt so important. That would be a whole new MOD.. whatever, we wait for Oracle

PS: Give me a link to your site

well thats a good alternative too 

[TheOracle]

no, paging would be NOT necessary

but thats in the future, and it isnt so important.

In that case, there's no way I could get involved on this one. Sorry.

[trez]

Why? You dont want to post the codes we need, because it may slow down our servers? Ok, its on our own risk! I just dont want spending the whole night searching the correct line for a function, when there are users like you, who can write it down just in a minute because their better than me in PHP.

[Stoleti]

In my opinion both ideias are good , paging of filter (dropdown) ... but i think paging ill be more easy and faster !